4.2 Article

Prognostic Role of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Journal

MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR
Volume 23, Issue -, Pages 315-324

Publisher

INT SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION, INC
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.902752

Keywords

Chemoradiotherapy; Neutrophils; Prognosis

Funding

  1. Natural Scientific Foundation of China [81402429]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang [LY14H60009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Increasing evidence suggests that cancer-associated inflammation is associated with poorer outcomes. The neutrophil- to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), considered as a systemic inflammation marker, is thought to predict prognoses in colorectal cancer. In this study, we explored the association between the NLR and prognoses following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Material/Methods: From February 2002 to December 2012, a group of 202 patients diagnosed with LARC and receiving neoadjuvant CRT followed by radical surgery was included in our retrospective study. The associations between the pre-CRT NLR and clinicopathological characteristics, as well as the predictive value of pre-CRT NLR against survival outcomes, were analyzed. Results: The average NLR was 2.7 +/- 1.5 (median 2.4, range 0.6-12.8). There were 63 (31.2%) patients with NLR >= 3.0, and 139 (68.8%) patients with NLR < 3.0. Correlation analyses showed that no clinicopathological characteristics except age were associated with NLR. We did not find an association between NLR and survival outcomes. In multivariate Cox model analyses, the R1/R2 resection, lymph node ratio >= 0.1, and perineural/lymphovascular invasion were independently associated with worse disease-free survival and overall survival. Conclusions: In our cohort, the NLR did not correlate with survival outcomes in LARC patients undergoing neoadjuvant CRT. The prognostic value of NLR should be validated in large-scale prospective studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available