4.4 Article

The proof of a new modified grey relational grade

Journal

GREY SYSTEMS-THEORY AND APPLICATION
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 180-186

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/GS-02-2016-0007

Keywords

Environmental protection fields; Four axioms; Grey relational grade; Mathematics logic

Funding

  1. Chienkuo Technology University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - Until now, many different varieties of grey relational grade methods had been proposed, and there are also many relevant publications. However, in one article published in 2007, which applied the previous grey relational grade to environmental protection fields and some results had been found. After studied it carefully, the author found that the grey relational grade in the paper was not the previous grey relational grade. According to the mathematics logic, it must first prove the proposed grey relational grade satisfies the four axioms in grey relational analysis, and then the author can say that the achieved results are reasonable and correct. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The paper lists the rational and regular grey relational grade that had been published in the past, and used the four axioms in grey system theory to prove the Pai's grey relational grade that satisfy the four axioms steps by steps. Findings - Through the detail proof of the proposed grey relational grade in Pai's paper, it indeed satisfies the four axioms in grey relational grade. Research limitations/implications - The paper had enhanced the correctness and reasonableness of that paper, and let the grey relational grade, which appear in Pai's paper is legitimate and correct grey relational grade in grey system theory. Originality/value - The paper had identified that Pai's grey relational grade is a rational and regular grey relational grade in grey system theory, and it proves that the results in Pai's paper are correct and reasonable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available