4.5 Article

A guide to analyzing biodiversity experiments

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANT ECOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 91-110

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rtw107

Keywords

analysis of variance; BEF-China; contrasts; linear models; mixed models; non-orthogonality; repeated measures; variance components

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030B_147092]
  2. University Research Priority Program Global Change and Biodiversity of the University of Zurich
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030B_147092] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims The aim of this guide is to provide practical help for ecologists who analyze data from biodiversity-ecosystem functioning experiments. Our approach differs from others in the use of least squares-based linear models (LMs) together with restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed models (MMs) for the analysis of hierarchical data. An original data set containing diameter and height of young trees grown in monocultures, 2- or 4-species mixtures under ambient light or shade is used as an example. Methods Starting with a simple LM, basic features of model fitting and the subsequent analysis of variance (ANOVA) for significance tests are summarized. From this, more complex models are developed. We use the statistical software R for model fitting and to demonstrate similarities and complementarities between LMs and MMs. The formation of contrasts and the use of error (LMs) or random-effects (MMs) terms to account for hierarchical data structure in ANOVAs are explained. Important Findings Data from biodiversity experiments can be analyzed at the level of entire plant communities (plots) and plant individuals. The basic explanatory term is species composition, which can be divided into contrasts in many ways depending on specific biological hypotheses. Typically, these contrasts code for aspects of species richness or the presence of particular species. For significance tests in ANOVAs, contrast terms generally are compared with remaining variation of the explanatory terms from which they have been 'carved out'. Once a final model has been selected, parameters (e.g. means or slopes for fixed-effects terms and variance components for error or random-effects terms) can be estimated to indicate the direction and size of effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available