4.6 Article

Pupil Variation Applied to the Eye Tracking Control of an Endoscopic Manipulator

Journal

IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 531-538

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2016.2521894

Keywords

Cognitive Human-Robot Interaction; Recognition; Surgical Robotics: Laparoscopy

Categories

Funding

  1. JSPS Global COE Program: Global Robot Academia, JSPS [26242061]
  2. JSPS [25220005]
  3. JSPS Challenging Exploratory Research [15K12606]
  4. Program for Leading Graduate Schools, Graduate Program for Embodiment Informatics of the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H07265, 26242061, 15K12606] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In laparoscopic surgery, numerous devices have been developed to allow surgeons to manipulate the laparoscope by themselves. Some previously adopted approaches include hands-free strategies, such as eye tracking. In this letter, we propose a new approach for the control of an endoscopic manipulator using pupil variation, which has not been previously attempted. We developed an intention recognition system for an endoscopic manipulator based on a support vector machine (SVM) and a probabilistic neural network (PNN). The SVM classifier, trained on pupil variation and eye rotation velocity data, recognizes when the operator wants to alter the direction of the endoscope. The PNN classifier determines in which direction the operator wants to move. We set up an experimental task to evaluate our proposal, and conclude that pupil variation has a significant effect on judging the timing for activating the endoscopic manipulator to project the operative field onto the center of the visual field on monitor. Moreover, it shows better performance than endoscope manipulation by an assistant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available