4.3 Article

Biogas upgrading process via low-temperature CO2 liquefaction and separation

Journal

JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 45, Issue -, Pages 812-824

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2017.07.001

Keywords

Biogas upgrading; CH4/CO2 separation; CO2 liquefaction; Low-temperature; Cryogenic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the field of biogas upgrading, there are five conventional technologies used for CO2 removal, namely, water scrubbing, chemical and physical scrubbing, membranes and Pressure swing adsorption. The present study aims to introduce an additional method for CO2 removal. On this basis, a process of low temperature CO2 liquefaction and separating from CH4/CO2 mixture is proposed as an alternative to the conventional upgrading technologies. The process simulation is done by Aspen HYSYS software which is a conventional chemical process simulator. In the system, four-stage compression, two low-temperature distillation columns, auxiliary refrigeration cascade cycle, expander and sufficient internal heat recovery are adopted. Installing Expander and internal heat recovery in the process can reduce the total energy penalty by 30%, with avoiding the occurrence of CO2 freeze-out, the process can achieve a reduction of CO2 concentration from 40% (mol) in raw biogas mixture to 2.9% (mol) in the upgraded biogas to meet the specification for pipeline transport or vehicle fuel (typically 2-3% CO2). Moreover, the total energy consumption, is only 0.25 kWh/Nm(3)raw biogas with over 99.9% (mol) CO2 purity captured and produced in liquid form as a by-product for transport. Further studies are performed to show the effect of varying CO2 concentration in the feed and the capacity of the plant on different process variables. It is concluded that the system can serve as a new promising approach for CO2 removal to upgrade biogas with low energy penalty. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available