4.6 Article

Size dependent sensitivity of Yb3+, Er3+ up-converting luminescent nano-thermometers

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
Volume 5, Issue 31, Pages 7890-7897

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7tc02322g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Center Poland (NCN) [DEC-2016/21/D/ST5/01638]
  2. National Science Center Poland (NCN) under the ETIUDA doctoral scholarship [DEC-2014/12/T/ST5/00646]
  3. ILTSR PAS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The non-contact temperature sensing using the luminescence intensity ratio (LIR) between H-2(11/2) -> I-4(15/2) and S-4(3/2) -> I-4(15/2) electronic transition in upconverting Yb3+ and Er3+ co-doped nanocrystals has been known for two decades. This phenomenon is governed by the simple Boltzmann formula, which however does not consider material's properties other than energy gap between the respective energy states. For example, the temperature sensitivity has never been shown to depend on the size of nanoparticles, however our studies, performed on two different NaYF4:Er3+, Yb3+ and LiLaP4O12:Er3+, Yb3+ nanocrystals clearly show evidences of such a relationship. Upon constant excitation intensity, the changes in the LIR emission intensity ratio in response to rising external temperature become consistently more rapid for smaller nanocrystals. It was found that the sensitivity of an up-converting luminescent thermometer changes proportionally to the nanoparticle size, i.e. raised from 1.1% K-1 @ 240 nm to 1.8% K-1 @ 20 nm for tetraphosphate nanocrystals and similarly raised from 1.1% K-1 @ 200 nm to 2.1% K-1 @ 8 nm for fluoride nanocrystals at 200 K. These phenomena were manifested mainly at low temperatures and can be neglected at temperatures above 250 K. The observed changes were discussed in terms of ratio of superficial to bulk ions. Phenomenological models have been proposed to describe both the size dependent luminescence lifetimes and temperature sensitivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available