4.6 Article

Synergistic effect by Na doping and S substitution for high thermoelectric performance of p-type MnTe

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
Volume 5, Issue 21, Pages 5076-5082

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7tc01480e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51572098, 51632006]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB632500]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei province [2015CFB432]
  4. Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology [2016-KF-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pristine MnTe is a p-type semiconductor with a relatively low hole concentration of 10(18) cm(-3), low electrical conductivity, and thus poor TE performance at room temperature owing to the broad direct band gap of 1.27 eV. In this study, Na2S was employed to be doped into the MnTe matrix to synergistically tune the electrical and thermal transport properties of the semiconductor via point defect engineering. On the one hand, Na substitution effectively improved the electrical transport properties by increasing the carrier concentration via the formation of acceptor-like defects, Na-Mn(-). On the other hand, thermal conductivities of the Na2S-doped samples were also sharply reduced via mass fluctuation and strain field fluctuation from the point defects introduced through Na doping and S substitution. Consequently, a maximum ZT of similar to 1.09 was achieved for the 0.5 at% Na2S-doped sample at 873 K, which was the highest ZT value ever reported for p-type MnTe-based thermoelectric materials. Moreover, the high performance 0.5 at% Na2S-doped sample also exhibited good thermal stability and mechanical stability (Vickers microhardness) of similar to 122 H-v, which was higher than those of other promising thermoelectric materials such as Bi2Te3, PbTe, PbSe, Cu2Se, and SnTe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available