4.7 Article

Removal of copper and nickel from municipal sludge using an improved electrokinetic process

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 307, Issue -, Pages 1008-1016

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.133

Keywords

Bipolar membrane; Electrokinetic; Municipal sludge; Heavy metals; Removal

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21507069]
  2. Fujian Province Department of Science and Technology [2012H0019, 2015YZ0001-1]
  3. Natural Science Funds of Fujian Province [2013J01034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An improved electrokinetic (EK) process for the removal of copper and nickel from municipal sludge was investigated using a custom-made experimental setup. Optimal parameters were identified as an HNO3 electrolyte concentration of 0.200 mol/L in the anode chamber; NaNO3 electrolyte concentrations of 0.800 mol/L in the heavy-metals and cathode chambers; and a current density of 2.0 mA/cm(2). Adjustment of the sludge pH to 3.8 before treatment clearly increased the current efficiency (CE) and decreased the specific energy consumption (SEC) of the process. Under the optimal conditions in EK systems equipped with two and three sludge chambers, the removal efficiencies for copper and nickel were 51.5-82.9% and 46.6-75.1%, respectively, after 132 h. The results of a sequential extraction procedure revealed that the binding states of the metals in the sludge were changed from difficult-to-extract to more easily extractable states after the EK process. Energy consumption calculations showed that the CE increased to 137.8% and the SEC decreased to 2.39 kWh/kg of metals removed when three sludge chambers were equipped in the EK system. A mechanistic analysis of the current method demonstrated that it can be regarded as an effective technique for removing metals from municipal sludge. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available