4.7 Article

Localizing impact damage of composite structures with modified RAPID algorithm and non-circular PZT arrays

Journal

ARCHIVES OF CIVIL AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 178-187

Publisher

ELSEVIER URBAN & PARTNER SP Z O O
DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2016.09.005

Keywords

Structural health monitoring; Guided waves damage localization; Vibration-based impact damage localization; Barely visible impact damage

Funding

  1. Structural Funds in the Operational Programme Innovative Economy (IEOP) from the European Regional Development Fund Project Modem material technologies in aerospace industry [POIG.01.01.0200-015/0800]
  2. National Science Centre (Poland) [DEC-2011/03/N/ST8/06205]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detecting and localizing impact damage of composite structures is one of the key expectations towards development of structural health monitoring (SHM) systems. In this paper, a method intended to meet these requirements is presented. The developed method is based on guided waves actuation in a monitored structure. One of the methods used for damage localization with guided waves is the RAPID/PRA algorithm. This algorithm is mostly used for circular arrays of PZT piezoelectric transducers. In the paper a modification of this approach, adopted to be used for more general geometries of PZT networks is presented. Its main improvement is that predicted location of damage is less biased by inhomogeneous distributions of sensing paths, i.e. lines connecting pairs of transducers of a network, than for RAPID algorithm. The developed method was verified experimentally on composite laminated specimens with introduced damage caused by low energy impact. Detailed description of the developed algorithm as well as the results of impact damage localization tests are delivered in the paper. (C) 2016 Politechnika Wroclawska. Published by Elsevier Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available