4.7 Article

Critical weather situations for renewable energies - Part B: Low stratus risk for solar power

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 101, Issue -, Pages 794-803

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.09.002

Keywords

Low stratus; Fog; Photovoltaic; Power forecast; Numerical weather prediction; Solar radiation

Funding

  1. 'Bundesminsterium fur Wirtschaft und Energie'
  2. project EWeLiNE (Erstellung innovativer Wetter-und Leistungsprognosemodelle fur die Netzintegration wetterabhangiger Energietrager) [0325500B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurately predicting the formation, development and dissipation of fog and low stratus (IS) still poses a challenge for numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. Errors in the low cloud cover NWP forecasts directly impact the quality of photovoltaic (PV) power prediction. On days with LS, day-ahead forecast errors of Germany-wide PV power frequently lie within the magnitude of the balance energy and thus pose a challenge for maintaining grid stability. An indication in advance about the possible occurrence of a critical weather situation such as LS would represent a helpful tool for transmission system operators (TSOs) in their day-to-day business. In the following, a detection algorithm for low stratus risk (LSR) is developed and applied as post-processing to the NWP model forecasts of the regional non-hydrostatic model COSMO-DE, operational at the German Weather Service. The aim of the LSR product is to supply day-ahead warnings and to support the decision making process of the TSOs. The quality of the LSR is assessed by comparing the computed regions of LSR occurrence with a satellite based cloud classification product from the Nowcasting Satellite Facility (NWCSAF). The results show that the LSR provides additional information that should in particular be useful for risk adverse users. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available