4.7 Article

Hopf and steady state bifurcation analysis in a ratio-dependent predator-prey model

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.07.027

Keywords

Prey-predator model; Turing instability; Pattern formation; Spatiotemporal bifurcation; Non-constant steady state

Funding

  1. Swedish Strategic Research Programme eSSENCE
  2. Science and Technology Program of Nantong [BK2014063]
  3. PRC Grant NSFC [11571301]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we perform spatiotemporal bifurcation analysis in a ratio-dependent predator prey model and derive explicit conditions for the existence of non-constant steady states that emerge through steady state bifurcation from related constant steady states. These explicit conditions are numerically verified in details and further compared to those conditions ensuring Turing instability. We find that (1) Turing domain is identical to the parametric domain where there exists only steady state bifurcation, which implies that Turing patterns are stable non-constant steady states, but the opposite is not necessarily true; (2) In non-Turing domain, steady state bifurcation and Hopf bifurcation act in concert to determine the emergent spatial patterns, that is, non-constant steady state emerges through steady state bifurcation but it may be unstable if the destabilising effect of Hopf bifurcation counteracts the stabilising effect of diffusion, leading to non-stationary spatial patterns; (3) Coupling diffusion into an ODE model can significantly enrich population dynamics by inducing alternative non-constant steady states (four different states are observed, two stable and two unstable), in particular when diffusion interacts with different types of bifurcation; (4) Diffusion can promote species coexistence by saving species which otherwise goes to extinction in the absence of diffusion. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available