4.6 Article

NMDAR dependent intracellular responses associated with cocaine conditioned place preference behavior

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 317, Issue -, Pages 218-225

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.09.047

Keywords

Conditioned place preference; Cocaine; NMDARs; Nucleus accumbens; Caudate putamen

Funding

  1. NIDA [DA12136, MD007599]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to investigate the intracellular responses associated with the acquisition and expression of cocaine-context associations. ERK (extracellular regulated kinase), CREB (cAMP responsive element binding protein), FosB and Delta FosB proteins were of particular interest due to their involvement in cocaine reward and in synaptic plasticity underlying learning and memory. We used the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm, which employs a Pavlovian conditioning procedure to establish an association between a drug-paired environment and the drug's rewarding effects, to study the role of these signaling pathways in cocaine-context associations. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonism prior to cocaine administration during conditioning blocked the acquisition of cocaine CPP and reduced Nucleus Accumbens (NAc) phosphorylated-ERK (pERK) and phosphorylated CREB (pCREB) levels following the CPP test (drug-free). We also show that cocaine-induced increases in Caudate Putamen (CPu) FosB and Delta FosB levels are decreased after MK-801 pre-treatment during conditioning. In addition, our results provide evidence for the involvement of striatal SIRT (Silent Information Regulator of Transcription) proteins in cocaine-CPP. These results will aid in the advancement of general knowledge about the molecular formation and retrieval of cocaine-associated memories that can be used in the future when designing treatments for cocaine addiction that target both prevention and relapse. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available