4.6 Article

Synthesis of a nanostructured rutile TiO2 electron transporting layer via an etching process for efficient perovskite solar cells: impact of the structural and crystalline properties of TiO2

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 5, Issue 24, Pages 12340-12353

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta02822a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Leading Human Resource Training Program of Regional Neo Industry through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and future Planning [NRF-2016H1D5A1909787]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [NRF-2017R1A2B4008117]
  3. Korea Research Fellowship Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2016H1D3A1909289]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A2B4008117] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present investigation, hollow and split nanostructures of rutile TiO2 have been synthesized using simple hydrothermal and chemical etching processes. Two typical structures such as TiO2 nanorods and nanoflowers were used as electron transporting layers (ETLs) for perovskite solar cells (PSCs). The optimized nanostructured ETLs were then used for mixed halide PSCs such as methyl ammonium iodide (MAPbI(3)), methyl ammonium iodide/chloride mixed-halide perovskite (MAPbI(3-x)Cl(x)) and (FAPbI(3))(0.85)(MAPbBr(3))(0.15) (herein FAPbI(3) = formamidinium lead halide and MAPbBr(3) = methylammonium lead bromide). The optimized results show a eta = 15.87% efficiency (J(SC) = 20.75 mA cm(-2), V-OC = 1.034, FF = 0.74) and a eta = 17.55% efficiency (J(SC) = 21.72 mA cm(-2), V-OC = 1.073, FF = 0.76) for (MAPbI(3-x)Cl(x)) and (FAPbI(3))(0.85)(MAPbBr(3))(0.15), respectively, for etched TiO2 with a split structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available