4.6 Article

Side-chain engineering for efficient non-fullerene polymer solar cells based on a wide-bandgap polymer donor

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 5, Issue 19, Pages 9204-9209

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta02075a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51422306, 51503135, 51573120, 91633301, 91333204]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  3. Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation [BK20150332]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [15KJB430027]
  5. Ministry of Science and Technology of China (973 project) [2014CB643501]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, a new wide-bandgap polymer, PSBZ, based on thienyl substituted benzodithiophene (BDTT) as the donor unit and difluorobenzotriazole (BTz-2F) as the acceptor unit was synthesized for photovoltaic applications. Compared to the analogous polymer J61 with linear dodecylthio side chains in the BDTT unit and a long 2-hexyldecyl side chain in BTz-2F, PSBZ possesses branched 2-butyloctyl side chains to increase steric hindrance of the BDTT unit and a short 2-butyloctyl side chain to decrease steric hindrance of the BTz-2F unit for more efficient charge separation and transport in the devices. As a result, PSBZ exhibited stronger pi-pi interaction and smaller stacking spacing leading to a higher extinction coefficient of 1.48 x 10(5) cm(-1) and a high hole mobility of 8.56 x 10(-3) cm(2) V-1 s(-1). Compared to the analogous polymer J61 with a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 9.53% and a short-circuit current density (J(sc)) of 17.43 mA cm(-2), the PSBZ: ITIC-based polymer solar cells yielded a higher PCE of 10.5% with a higher J(sc) of 19.0 mA cm(-2). The results show that our design strategy is successful for improving photovoltaic performance by side chain engineering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available