4.6 Article

Achieving quantum supremacy with sparse and noisy commuting quantum computations

Journal

QUANTUM
Volume 1, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

VEREIN FORDERUNG OPEN ACCESS PUBLIZIERENS QUANTENWISSENSCHAF
DOI: 10.22331/q-2017-04-25-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC Early Career Fellowship [EP/L021005/1]
  2. Australian Research Council via the Future Fellowship scheme [FT110101044]
  3. ARC Centre of Excellence for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology (CQC2T) [CE170100012]
  4. EPSRC [EP/L021005/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L021005/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Australian Research Council [FT110101044] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The class of commuting quantum circuits known as IQP (instantaneous quantum polynomial-time) has been shown to be hard to simulate classically, assuming certain complexity-theoretic conjectures. Here we study the power of IQP circuits in the presence of physically motivated constraints. First, we show that there is a family of sparse IQP circuits that can be implemented on a square lattice of n qubits in depth O(root n log n), and which is likely hard to simulate classically. Next, we show that, if an arbitrarily small constant amount of noise is applied to each qubit at the end of any IQP circuit whose output probability distribution is sufficiently anticoncentrated, there is a polynomial-time classical algorithm that simulates sampling from the resulting distribution, up to constant accuracy in total variation distance. However, we show that purely classical error-correction techniques can be used to design IQP circuits which remain hard to simulate classically, even in the presence of arbitrary amounts of noise of this form. These results demonstrate the challenges faced by experiments designed to demonstrate quantum supremacy over classical computation, and how these challenges can be overcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available