4.6 Article

Tuning CH3NH3Pb(I1-xBrx)3 perovskite oxygen stability in thin films and solar cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 5, Issue 20, Pages 9553-9560

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta00058h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/M023532/1, EP/K010298/1, EP/K030671/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/J021199/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1231067, EP/J021199/1, 1565500] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rapid development of organic-inorganic lead halide perovskites has resulted in high efficiency photovoltaic devices. However the susceptibility of these devices to degradation under environmental stress has so far hindered commercial development, requiring for example expensive device encapsulation. Herein, we have investigated the stability of CH3NH3Pb(I1-xBrx)(3) [x = 0-1] thin films and solar cells under controlled humidity, light, and oxygen conditions. We show that higher bromide ratios increase tolerance to moisture, with x = 1 thin films being stable to 120 h of moisture stress. Under light and dry air, partial bromide (x < 1) substitution does not enhance film stability significantly, with the corresponding solar cells degrading within two hours. In contrast, CH3NH3PbBr3 films show excellent stability, with device stability being limited by the organic interlayer. For these x = 1 films, we show that charge carriers are quenched in the presence of oxygen and form superoxide; however in contrast to perovskites containing iodide, this superoxide does not degrade the crystal. Our observations show that iodide limits the oxygen and light stability of CH3NH3Pb(I1-xBrx)(3) perovskites, but that CH3NH3PbBr3 provides an opportunity to develop inherently stable high voltage photovoltaic devices and 4-terminal tandem solar cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available