4.6 Article

Poly(p-phenylene)-based membrane materials with excellent cell efficiencies and durability for use in vanadium redox flow batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 5, Issue 24, Pages 12285-12296

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta03131a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Energy Efficiency & Resources Core Technology Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) [20152010103210]
  2. Technology Innovation Program (Cation/anion exchange and adsorption polymers for desalination applications) - Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE, Korea) [10047796]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20152010103210] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poly(p-phenylene)-based ionomers with remarkable durability and rate capability for use in vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs) are reported. The family of synthesized ionomers, sPBPSP-z, exhibited not only well-developed phase separation between hydrophilic domains and hydrophobic domains but also well-connected hydrophilic channels, resulting in enhanced proton conductivities and excellent dimensional stabilities. sPBPSP-8, which has an ion exchange capacity of 1.83 meq g(-1), showed high discharge capacity retention and superior efficiencies over 100 cycles at a current density of 50 mA cm(-2). In addition, the sPBPSP-8 ionomer exhibited stable performance at various current densities (50-180 mA cm(-2)) and retained high efficiencies at high current densities. Furthermore, this material exhibited superior chemical stability under oxidizing conditions, excellent capacity retention, and high efficiencies during long-term VRFB operation (1000 cycles). These results indicate that the sPBPSP-8 membrane is a superb material for VRFB applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available