4.6 Article

Highly reversible sodium storage in a GeP5/C composite anode with large capacity and low voltage

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 5, Issue 9, Pages 4413-4420

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta00139h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21571073, 51302099]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2015CB932600]
  3. Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2016CFA031]
  4. Program for HUST Interdisciplinary Innovation Team [2015ZDTD038]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sodium ion batteries (SIBs) are considered to be a promising alternative to lithium ion batteries because of the high abundance of sodium. However, the scarcities of suitable anode materials severely hamper the development of SIBs. Here, we synthesized a GeP5/C composite with binary sodium-reactive components on a large scale. Theoretically, it can promise a capacity of 1888 mA h g(-1) or 6891 mA h cm(-3), which is the best record in anodes for SIBs reported so far. In practice, the GeP5/C showed a low potential of approximate to 0.4 V vs. Na+/Na with a smooth charge/discharge profile. It delivered a large reversible capacity of 1250 mA h g(-1) with a first coulombic efficiency of 93%. Electrochemical-mechanism studies suggested that the formation of a GeP5 phase endowed a high first coulombic efficiency and synergetic effect between the sodiation of Ge and P. This effect smoothly leveled the multistep plateaus and effectively reduced the polarization between charge/discharge. When applied to a full cell by coupling a Na3V2(PO4)(3)/C cathode, the assembled Na3V2(PO4)(3)//GeP5 full cell showed a large capacity of 800 mA h g(-1) with a high average output voltage of 2.65 V. The excellent sodium-storage performances of GeP5/C will ensure commercial utilization in future SIBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available