4.6 Review

Additive engineering for highly efficient organic-inorganic halide perovskite solar cells: recent advances and perspectives

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 5, Issue 25, Pages 12602-12652

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta01798g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China-Fundamental Studies of Perovskite Solar Cells [2015CB932200]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [51035063]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [55135039, 55135040]
  4. Jiangsu Specially-Appointed Professor program [54907024]
  5. Nanjing Tech University [3983500160, 3983500151, 44235022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Organic-inorganic halide perovskite solar cells have recently attracted much attention due to their low-cost fabrication, flexibility, and high efficiency. The power conversion efficiency achieved with such cells was over 22% in 2016 from an initial 3.81% in 2009, highlighting how the cells are now benefiting from the highly optimized morphology of perovskite films. To date, a great number of approaches have been done to improve the morphology of perovskite films, in which additives play an important role in perovskite crystal growth and in the dynamics of the crystallinity, and thus the performance of perovskite solar cells. Herein, we review the recent progress on additives, such as polymers, fullerene, metal halide salts, organic halide salts, inorganic acids, solvents, and nanoparticles, in improving the morphology of perovskite films in terms of the crystal growth, crystallization kinetics, and device performance. We also discuss the importance of further understanding the fundamental homogeneous nucleation process by the use of additives. Further innovation in terms of the additives could help to further develop high-performance devices with long-term stability for future practical applications of perovskite solar cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available