4.7 Article

Homes as machines: Exploring expert and public imaginaries of low carbon housing futures in the United Kingdom

Journal

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
Volume 23, Issue -, Pages 36-45

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.10.011

Keywords

Low carbon housing; Socio-technical imaginaries; Futures; Imagined publics

Funding

  1. RCUK [EPSRC - EP/M008053/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M008053/1, EP/K011774/1, EP/N022645/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/K011774/1, EP/M008053/1, EP/N022645/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low carbon housing policies embody visions of the future that shape and constrain current choices between different technological pathways. These socio-technical imaginaries include expectations around new ways of living and interacting with technology, with implications for everyday lives. This paper investigates existing expert visions of low carbon housing, and explores these futures with members of the public; utilising empirical data from policy documents, expert interviews and public focus groups. Two competing expert visions of low carbon housing were identified: Passivhaus and Smart Homes. Whilst portrayed as divergent futures, both visions aimed to 'design out' the role of occupants, achieving emissions reductions through changes to the built environment and maintaining current lifestyles; a position that was reinforced by an imagined public that was unable or unwilling to accept the need for lifestyle change. This construction of the public did not consider the complex personal and cultural dimensions that influenced public acceptability of future housing: specifically surrounding themes of comfort, control and security that arose within the focus groups. The tensions arising between expert and public imaginaries highlight the difficulties that may surround any transition towards a low carbon future and demonstrate the need to work with, rather than around, the public. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available