4.6 Article

FAPb1-xSnxI3 mixed metal halide perovskites with improved light harvesting and stability for efficient planar heterojunction solar cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 5, Issue 19, Pages 9097-9106

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ta11181e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0700700]
  2. National New Energy Materials Technology RD Center [NENMC-I-1701]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61674174]
  4. Science and Technology Development Foundation of China Academy of Engineering Physics [2014B0302054]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Organic-inorganic halide perovskites possess excellent chemical, optical, and electronic properties that make them attractive for next-generation solar cells. An important target for the further improvement of perovskite-based solar cells is to eliminate or reduce the use of the heavy metal lead. Herein, we systematically investigated the performance of FAPb(1-x)Sn(x)I(3) mixed metal halide perovskites. The addition of Sn led to the stabilization of the perovskite phase and the low temperature of 100 degrees C was enough to result in the formation of the perovskite phase. The efficiency of the solar cell fabricated in this study is over 10% at x = 0.5, owing to the improved light harvesting in spite of the reduced open voltage. As more Sn was added, the device performance gradually deteriorated. Importantly, we performed stability tests under white light illumination and demonstrated that the FASn(0.5)Pb(0.5)I(3) material might be intrinsically stable in a nitrogen environment. These results show that the device based on the FASn(0.5)Pb(0.5)I(3) absorber without encapsulation retained over 85% of the initial efficiency for 100 h in nitrogen, indicating that a highly efficient perovskite solar cell with reduced Pb content and long-term stability could be realized.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available