4.6 Review

A critical review on tin halide perovskite solar cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 5, Issue 23, Pages 11518-11549

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta00929a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Community [PIEG-GA-2012-327015]
  2. RESEARCH PROJECTS FOR EXCELLENCE IKY/SIEMENS Programme
  3. Research Committee of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Ask authors/readers for more resources

APbI(3-x)Br(x) perovskite solar cells with the bandgap of similar to 1.5-1.6 eV, where A represents caesium, methylammonium, formamidinium and mixtures thereof, currently present certified efficiencies very close to those of established thin film technologies (such as CIGS and CdTe) and are thus one of the most important optoelectronics. To restrict the use of lead, as well as to tune the band gap of the material close to the optimum according to the Shockley-Queisser limit (being 1.34 eV), substitution (total or partial) of Pb2+ by Sn2+ should take place. In this review, we present results on single junction solar cells, utilizing CsSnI3-xBrx, CH3NH3SnI3-xBrx or NH2CH=NH2SnI3-xBrx perovskites as absorbers, as well as a mixture of Sn2+/Pb2+ being adopted as the metal binary cation, reducing the bandgap to 1.2-1.4 eV. We also highlight very recently recorded efficiencies of perovskite-on-perovskite tandem solar cells, produced by the combination of the above low band gap materials with typical highly performing semi-transparent APbI(3-x)Br(x) perovskites of a higher band gap (close to 1.6-1.8 eV). We discuss these fascinating results, focusing on some key points such as, among others, the role of the tin compensator/reducing agent (usually SnF2) during perovskite crystallization. In addition, we present the critical challenges that currently limit the efficiency/stability of these systems and propose prospects for future directions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available