4.6 Article

High throughput fabrication of mesoporous carbon perovskite solar cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 5, Issue 35, Pages 18643-18650

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta05674e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) through the Self-assembling Perovskite Absorbers Cells Engineered into Modules project [EP/M015254/1]
  2. SPECIFIC Innovation and Knowledge Centre [EP/N020863/1]
  3. Welsh Government
  4. British Council through the Newton Al-Farabi Partnership
  5. Welsh European Funding Office (SPARC II)
  6. CONACyT [FDC-2015-110]
  7. EPSRC [EP/M015254/2, EP/N020863/1, EP/M015254/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M015254/2, EP/N020863/1, EP/M015254/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. The British Council [172723657] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The screen printed mesoporous carbon perovskite solar cell has great potential for commercialisation due to its scalable deposition processes and use of inexpensive materials. However, each layer requires long high temperature heating steps to achieve the necessary sintering and porosity, which is very time and energy intensive for large scale production. Near infrared processing is demonstrated here to reduce the heating time of mesoporous layers within a fully printed lead halide perovskite solar cell from 2 hours to 30 seconds. A stabilised efficiency of 11% was achieved by processing in 30 seconds, identical to that of devices heated in 2 hours. For the first time the effect of residual binder in the carbon electrode on the electron lifetime and charge transfer within devices has been investigated. Furthermore cross section EDX mapping of perovskite infiltration provides a greater understanding into the processing requirements of these devices vital to enable commercialisation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available