4.6 Article

Synthesis and side-chain engineering of phenylnaphthalenediimide (PNDI)-based n-type polymers for efficient all-polymer solar cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 5, Issue 11, Pages 5449-5459

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ta10978k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation Grants-Korean Government [2015M1A2A2057509, 2012M3A6A7055540, 2014M3A7B4051749]
  2. KETEP
  3. MOTIE of the Republic of Korea [20163030013620]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [PAL-2017, 2015M1A2A2057509] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We designed and synthesized a series of n-type conjugated polymers by introducing phenylnaphthalenediimide (PNDI) as a novel n-type building block, and investigated the effect of side-chain engineering of the polymer acceptors on the performance of all-polymer solar cells (all-PSCs). The optical, electrochemical, and structural properties of the polymers with three different side chains of 2-ethylhexyl (PPNDI-EH), 2-butyloctyl (PPNDI-BO), and 2-hexyldecyl (PPNDI-HD) groups were examined. Interestingly, the PNDI-based polymer having the longest side chain showed a higher degree of edge-on oriented intermolecular assembly in thin films, thereby resulting in the highest field-effect electron mobility among the three polymers. Also, we examined the performance of PNDI-based polymers as polymer acceptors in all-PSCs. Unlike the trend in the field-effect transistor, the PPNDI-BO-based all-PSCs exhibited the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 4.25% among the three polymer blends. This was attributed to the well-balanced hole/electron transport and higher exciton dissociation probability in the PPNDI-BO-based all-PSCs, benefitted from the well-intermixed blend morphology between the polymer donor and PPNDI-BO.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available