3.8 Proceedings Paper

What'd You Say Again? Recurrence Quantification Analysis as a Method for Analyzing the Dynamics of Discourse in a Reading Strategy Tutor

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3027385.3027445

Keywords

Intelligent Tutoring Systems; Natural Language Processing; stealth assessment; corpus linguistics; dynamics; reading

Funding

  1. NSF [REC0241133, IIS-0735682]
  2. [IES R305G020018-02]
  3. [IES R305G040046]
  4. [IES R305A080589]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we investigated the degree to which the cognitive processes in which students engage during reading comprehension could be examined through dynamical analyses of their natural language responses to texts. High school students (n = 142) generated typed self-explanations while reading a science text. They then completed a comprehension test that measured their comprehension at both surface and deep levels. The recurrent patterns of the words in students' self-explanations were first visualized in recurrence plots. These visualizations allowed us to qualitatively analyze the different self-explanation processes of skilled and less skilled readers. These recurrence plots then allowed us to calculate recurrence indices, which represented the properties of these temporal word patterns. Results of correlation and regression analyses revealed that these recurrence indices were significantly related to the students' comprehension scores at both surface- and deep levels. Additionally, when combined with summative metrics of word use, these indices were able to account for 32% of the variance in students' overall text comprehension scores. Overall, our results suggest that recurrence quantification analysis can be utilized to guide both qualitative and quantitative assessments of students' comprehension.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available