4.4 Article

Simplified models of dark matter with a long-lived co-annihilation partner

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2017)041

Keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM

Funding

  1. STFC through IPPP consolidated grant
  2. Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award
  3. CONACyT
  4. National Science Centre, Poland [DEC-2014/15/B/ST2/02157, DEC-2015/18/M/ST2/00054]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We introduce a new set of simplified models to address the effects of 3-point interactions between the dark matter particle, its dark co-annihilation partner, and the Standard Model degree of freedom, which we take to be the tau lepton. The contributions from dark matter co-annihilation channels are highly relevant for a determination of the correct relic abundance. We investigate these effects as well as the discovery potential for dark matter co-annihilation partners at the LHC. A small mass splitting between the dark matter and its partner is preferred by the co-annihilation mechanism and suggests that the co-annihilation partners may be long-lived (stable or meta-stable) at collider scales. It is argued that such long-lived electrically charged particles can be looked for at the LHC in searches of anomalous charged tracks. This approach and the underlying models provide an alternative/complementarity to the mono-jet and multi-jet based dark matter searches widely used in the context of simplified models with the s-channel mediators. We consider four types of simplified models with different particle spins and coupling structures. Some of these models are manifestly gauge invariant and renormalizable, others would ultimately require a UV completion. These can be realised in terms of supersymmetric models in the neutralino-stau co-annihilation regime, as well as models with extra dimensions or composite models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available