4.4 Article

NLO QCD-EW predictions for HV and HV plus jet production including parton-shower effects

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2017)012

Keywords

NLO Computations

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PP00P2-128552]
  2. Research Executive Agency (REA) of the European Union [PITN-GA-2010-264564, PITN-GA-2012-316704]
  3. STFC [ST/G000905/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PP00P2_128552] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G000905/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the first NLO QCD+EW predictions for Higgs boson production in association with a bit or l(+)l(-) pair plus zero or one jets at the LHC. Fixed order NLO QCD+EW calculations are combined with a QCD+QED parton shower using the recently developed resonance aware method in the POWHEG framework. Moreover, applying the improved MiNLO technique to Hl nu l+jet and Hl(+)l(-)+jet production at NLO QCD+EW, we obtain predictions that are NLO accurate for observables with both zero or one resolved jet. This approach permits also to capture higher order effects associated with the interplay of EW corrections and QCD radiation. The behavior of EW corrections is studied for various kinematic distributions, relevant for experimental analyses of Higgsstrahlung processes at the 13 TeV LHC. Exact NLO EW corrections are complemented with approximate analytic formulae that account for the leading and next to leading Sudakov logarithms in the high-energy regime. In the tails of transverse momentum distributions, relevant for analyses in the boosted Higgs regime, the Sudakov approximation works well, and NLO EW effects can largely exceed the ten percent level. Our predictions are based on the POWHEG BOX RES+OpenLoops framework in combination with the Pythia 8.1 parton shower.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available