3.8 Proceedings Paper

Densely Connected Convolutional Networks

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2017.243

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [III-1618134, III- 1526012, IIS-1149882]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates foundation [III-1618134, III- 1526012, IIS-1149882]
  3. International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program of China Postdoctoral Council [20150015]
  4. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CBA00300, 2011CBA00301]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61361136003]
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1521583] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent work has shown that convolutional networks can be substantially deeper, more accurate, and efficient to train if they contain shorter connections between layers close to the input and those close to the output. In this paper, we embrace this observation and introduce the Dense Convolutional Network (DenseNet), which connects each layer to every other layer in a feed-forward fashion. Whereas traditional convolutional networks with L layers have L connections-one between each layer and its subsequent layer-our network has L(L+1)/2 direct connections. For each layer, the feature-maps of all preceding layers are used as inputs, and its own feature-maps are used as inputs into all subsequent layers. DenseNets have several compelling advantages: they alleviate the vanishing-gradient problem, strengthen feature propagation, encourage feature reuse, and substantially reduce the number of parameters. We evaluate our proposed architecture on four highly competitive object recognition benchmark tasks (CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, SVHN, and ImageNet). DenseNets obtain significant improvements over the state-of-the-art on most of them, whilst requiring less computation to achieve high performance. Code and pre-trained models are available at https://github.com/liuzhuang13/DenseNet.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available