4.6 Article

Systematic Correlation Analyses of Circulating Tumor Cells with Clinical Variables and Tumor Markers in Lung Cancer Patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 8, Issue 15, Pages 3099-3104

Publisher

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/jca.18032

Keywords

Lung cancer; circulating tumor cells; serum neuron-specific enolase; epidemiologic factors; metastasis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81501962, 81071920, 81372835, 81372870, 81272294, 31430021]
  2. Youth fund of the first hospital of Jilin university [JDYY52015003]
  3. Jilin Provincial Science and Technology Department Grant [11ZDGG003]
  4. Key Clinical Project of the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China Grant [2001133]
  5. NIH [1R43 CA103553-01]
  6. California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) [RT2-01942]
  7. Jilin International Collaboration Grant [20120720]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measurement of circulating tumor cells (CTC) offers promise as a clinical biomarker to monitor disease status, therapeutic response, and progression in cancer patients. However, its clinical value in lung cancer patients has not been fully explored. We systematically evaluate the association of CTCs with clinical variables and tumor markers in a cohort of lung cancer patients. Using the CELLSEARCH System, CTCs were detected in both small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients prior to therapy. Univariate analysis revealed that detection of CTC was related to histology, stage, tumor size, invasiveness, and lymphatic metastasis. CTCs were associated with distant metastases in NSCLC, but not in SCLC. Using multivariate analysis, we found that CTCs were independently correlated with disease stage, SCLC, and elevated serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE). These data suggest that CTCs are more likely to be detected in patients with stage IV disease and with SCLC, and that elevated serum NSE predicts the presence of CTCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available