3.8 Proceedings Paper

3D Convolutional Neural Networks with Graph Refinement for Airway Segmentation Using Incomplete Data Labels

Journal

MACHINE LEARNING IN MEDICAL IMAGING (MLMI 2017)
Volume 10541, Issue -, Pages 141-149

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67389-9_17

Keywords

Airway tree segmentation; CT; Convolutional neural network; Graph method; Incomplete label

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intrathoracic airway segmentation from computed tomography images is a frequent prerequisite for further quantitative lung analyses. Due to low contrast and noise, especially at peripheral branches, it is often challenging for automatic methods to strike a balance between extracting deeper airway branches and avoiding leakage to the surrounding parenchyma. Meanwhile, manual annotations are extremely time consuming for the airway tree, which inhibits automated methods requiring training data. To address this, we introduce a 3D deep learning-based workflow able to produce high-quality airway segmentation from incompletely labeled training data generated without manual intervention. We first train a 3D fully convolutional network (FCN) based on the fact that 3D spatial information is crucial for small highly anisotropic tubular structures such as airways. For training the 3D FCN, we develop a domain-specific sampling scheme that strategically uses incomplete labels from a previous highly specific segmentation method, aiming to retain similar specificity while boosting sensitivity. Finally, to address local discontinuities of the coarse 3D FCN output, we apply a graph-based refinement incorporating fuzzy connectedness segmentation and robust curve skeletonization. Evaluations on the EXACT' 09 and LTRC datasets demonstrate considerable improvements in airway extraction while maintaining reasonable leakage compared with a stateof- art method and the dataset reference standard.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available