Journal
METHODSX
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages 68-75Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2017.01.004
Keywords
Hair cortisol; HCC; Hair analysis; Long-term stress; Wash solvent; Wildlife; Bear
Categories
Funding
- Alberta Innovation and Science [IP-06-025A-SE]
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN 288163]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Methodological differences among laboratories are recognized as significant sources of variation in quantification of hair cortisol concentration (HCC). An important step in processing hair, particularly when collected from wildlife, is the choice of solvent used to remove or wash external hair shaft cortisol prior to quantification of HCC. The present study systematically compared methanol and isopropanol as wash solvents for their efficiency at removing external cortisol without extracting internal hair shaft cortisol in samples collected from free-ranging grizzly bears and polar bears. Cortisol concentrations in solvents and hair were determined in each of one to eight washes of hair with each solvent independently. There were no significant decreases in internal hair shaft cortisol among all eight washes for either solvent, although methanol removed detectable hair surface cortisol after one wash in grizzly bear hair whereas hair surface cortisol was detected in all eight isopropanol washes. There were no significant differences in polar bear HCC washed one to eight times with either solvent, but grizzly bear HCC was significantly greater in hair washed with isopropanol compared to methanol. There were significant differences in HCC quantified using different commercial ELISA kits commonly used for HCC determinations. (c) 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available