4.7 Article

Online gaming involvement and its positive and negative consequences: A cognitive anthropological cultural consensus approach to psychiatric measurement and assessment

Journal

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR
Volume 66, Issue -, Pages 291-302

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.025

Keywords

Internet gaming disorder; Internet addiction; Engaged play; Anthropology; Cultural consensus analysis

Funding

  1. Colorado State University and its Department of Anthropology
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1600448 - EAGER]
  3. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  4. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [1600448] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We employed ethnographic methods more attentive to insider gamer perspectives to develop culturally-sensitive scale measures of online gaming involvement and its positive and negative consequences. Our inquiry combined relatively unstructured in-garrie participant-observation, semi structured interviews, and a web survey. The latter derived from both ethnography and theory, and contained 15 involvement items and 21 each for positive and negative consequences items. Cultural consensus analysis revealed broadly shared understandings among players about online gaming involvement and its positive consequences, but less agreement about negative scale items. Our findings suggest the need for caution in employing current tools to assess addictive and disordered gaming, as our gamer respondents judged commonly used scale items, such as cognitive salience, withdrawal, and tolerance, as not fitting with their own understandings and experiences. We argue that our approach, rooted in gamers' actual experiences and also current theory, contributes to more valid psychiatric assessments of online gaming experiences, though more research is needed to refine the new measures we present. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available