4.5 Article

Seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnant women: knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors in Italy

Journal

BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-2138-2

Keywords

Behaviors; Cross-sectional survey; Italy; Pregnant women; Seasonal influenza; Vaccination

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The aims of this study were to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors towards seasonal influenza and its vaccination among pregnant women. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was carried out among a sample of women in the second or third trimester of pregnancy in Italy. Results: The 64.2% of the sample knew that the influenza is more dangerous for pregnant women. Women of older age, Italian, and who had a pregnancy at high-risk were more likely to have this knowledge. This knowledge was lower among women with none, primary or secondary school education. The majority of the respondents considered the vaccine not very useful during pregnancy. Those younger, unmarried, who knew that influenza is more dangerous for pregnant women, who knew that the vaccine could protect them, who reported a higher self-rated health status, and who had received information about influenza and its vaccination were more likely to have a positive attitude toward the usefulness of influenza vaccination in pregnancy. Women with secondary school education and with more than one child revealed a lower perception. Only 9.7% had received the vaccine and 21.4% of those unvaccinated would be willing to receive it. This positive attitude was higher among women with one child, who knew that the vaccine could protect them against the influenza, and who have a positive attitude toward the usefulness of the vaccination during pregnancy. Conclusions: Health educational programs are needed to improve the knowledge about seasonal influenza and vaccination rate in pregnancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available