4.6 Article

ARA-PEPs: a repository of putative sORF-encoded peptides in Arabidopsis thaliana

Journal

BMC BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-016-1458-y

Keywords

RNA-seq; Tiling arrays; sORFs; Database; Peptides; Arabidopsis thaliana

Funding

  1. KU Leuven Research Fund
  2. Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO)-Vlaanderen [1522614 N]
  3. VIB department of Plant Systems Biology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Many eukaryotic RNAs have been considered non-coding as they only contain short open reading frames (sORFs). However, there is increasing evidence for the translation of these sORFs into bioactive peptides with potent signaling, antimicrobial, developmental, antioxidant roles etc. Yet only a few peptides encoded by sORFs are annotated in the model organism Arabidopsis thaliana. Results: To aid the functional annotation of these peptides, we have developed ARA-PEPs (available at http://www.biw.kuleuven.be/CSB/ARA-PEPs), a repository of putative peptides encoded by sORFs in the A. thaliana genome starting from in-house Tiling arrays, RNA-seq data and other publicly available datasets. ARA-PEPs currently lists 13,748 sORF-encoded peptides with transcriptional evidence. In addition to existing data, we have identified 100 novel transcriptionally active regions (TARs) that might encode 341 novel stress-induced peptides (SIPs). To aid in identification of bioactivity, we add functional annotation and sequence conservation to predicted peptides. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the largest repository of plant peptides encoded by sORFs with transcript evidence, publicly available and this resource will help scientists to effortlessly navigate the list of experimentally studied peptides, the experimental and computational evidence supporting the activity of these peptides and gain new perspectives for peptide discovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available