4.7 Article

Government intervention and land misallocation: Evidence from China

Journal

CITIES
Volume 60, Issue -, Pages 323-332

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.006

Keywords

Government intervention; Land misallocation; Land leasing; Local government; China

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71373243, 71203197]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY17G030016]
  3. Project of Philosophy and Social Science of Zhejiang Province [15NDJC163YB, 15NDJC185YB]
  4. Key Soft Science Research project of Zhejiang Province [2016C25003]
  5. Key Project of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research of Ministry of Education of China [Z20130253]
  6. Advance Project of Humanities and Social Sciences of Zhejiang University of Technology [10YJC790053]
  7. Research Center of Technology Innovation and Enterprises Internationalization, Key Research Base of Philosophy and Social Science of Zhejiang Province [15JDJS01Z]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Strong government intervention exists in China's land market compared to other countries. This paper examines the effects of government intervention on land misallocation and identifies its source, based on Chinese prefecture-level cities' panel data from 2003 to 2012. The empirical results show that local government's distorted land leasing price policy, by which it leases out industrial land at a lower price, and leases out commercial and residential land at a higher price, leads to land misallocation between the industrial and service sectors. Local governments' revenue and political incentives also cause land misallocation. More land is leased to the industrial sector when local governments intervene more in land prices and rely more on investments, and when local officials have an incentive to signal performance in the early years of their tenure. The distorted land-leasing policy results from local governments' attracting investments and land-financing incentives, which leads them to lower industrial land prices to attract investments, and to push up commercial and residential land prices in order to pursue revenue. Political cycles foster the effects of land price distortion on land misallocation. Reforms of China's land-leasing system and central-local fiscal institutional arrangements are needed to reshape local governments' land-leasing incentives and remove land price distortion. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available