4.6 Article

Simultaneous pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of (ligno) celluloses in aqueous-ionic liquid media: A compromise

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages 77-86

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2016.10.004

Keywords

Lignocellulosic biomass; Cellulose; Cellulase; Enzymatic saccharification; Ionic liquid; One-pot process

Funding

  1. Conseil Regional de Picardie (SISAF project)
  2. European Union
  3. Ministere francais de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In view of decreasing the amount of IL to achieve efficient simultaneous pretreatment and saccharification, a comprehensive study was undertaken. Different types of lignocellulosic biomasses were investigated in various enzymatic aqueous-IL systems including 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([C2mirn][OAc]) or 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium methylphosphonate ([C2mim][MeO(H)PO2]). To better understand how 10% (v/v) of IL in the reaction medium led to the highest yields of glucose without fractionation from sawdust, distinct cellulosic models were then used as substrates. Kinetic studies demonstrated that both ILs affect synergistic action of cellulolytic enzymes depending on both constitutive anion and cellulosic substrate. Concentrations above 10% v/v of ILs deactivated cellulase even on highly digestible model substrates. beta and alpha Kamlet-Taft parameters constituted more physicochemical pertinent indicators than apparent pH value to investigate effects of IL on cellulase performances. Fine description of these effects was proposed onto individual EG, CBH and BG. [C2mim][MeO(H)PO2] was demonstrated a better compatible IL for enzymes up to a concentration of 30% ( v/v). The efficiency of simultaneous pretreatment and saccharification was governed by a compromise between better substrate accessibility and enzyme deactivation. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available