4.8 Article

Low-Temperature Solution-Processed SnO2 Nanoparticles as a Cathode Buffer Layer for Inverted Organic Solar Cells

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 1645-1653

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b10857

Keywords

SnO2 nanoparticles; solution-processed metal oxide; low-temperature synthesis; nanoparticle morphology; cathode buffer layer; inverted organic solar cells

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2015042417]
  2. Basic Science Research Program through NRF - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2015R1A2A2A01004404]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015R1A2A2A01004404] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

SnO2 recently has attracted particular attention as a powerful buffer layer for organic optoelectronic devices due to its outstanding properties such as high electron mobility, suitable band alignment, and high optical transparency. Here, we report on facile low-temperature solution-processed SnO2 nanoparticles (NPs) in applications for a cathode buffer layer (CBL) of inverted organic solar cells (iOSCs). The conduction band energy of SnO2 NPs estimated by ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy was 4.01 eV, a salient feature that is necessary for an appropriate CBL. Using SnO2 NPs as CBL derived from a 0.1 M precursor concentration, P3HT:PC60BM-based iOSCs showed the best power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 2.9%. The iOSC devices using SnO2 NPs as CBL revealed excellent long-term device stabilities, and the PCE was retained at similar to 95% of its initial value after 10 weeks in ambient air. These solution-processed SnO2 NPs are considered to be suitable for the low-cost, high throughput roll-to-roll process on a flexible substrate for optoelectronic devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available