4.7 Article

Optimal Scheduling of Battery Charging Station Serving Electric Vehicles Based on Battery Swapping

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 1372-1384

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2017.2764484

Keywords

Battery charging station; charging scheduling; electric vehicles; generalized benders decomposition; battery swapping

Funding

  1. General Research Funds established under the University Grant Committee of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [16209814, 16210215]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A battery charging station (BCS) is a charging facility that supplies electric energy for recharging electric vehicles' depleted batteries (DBs). A BCS has a certain number of charging bays and maintains a dynamic inventory of fully charged batteries (FBs). This paper studies a BCS scheduling (BCSS) problem whose target is to schedule the charging processes of the charging bays such that the charging cost is minimized while satisfying the FB demand. Specifically, the BCSS problem has two types of operations: 1) loading DBs into the charging bays and then unloading them to the FB inventory when they are fully charged and 2) controlling the charging rate of each charging bay. We formulate the BCSS problem as a mixed-integer program with quadratic battery degradation cost. A generalized benders decomposition algorithm is then developed to solve the problem efficiently. The salience of the developed algorithm is that: 1) each charging bay can solve its own subproblem separately and 2) each subproblem can be further partitioned into multiple independent and identically structured quadratic programming problems, and thus the algorithm facilitates an efficient parallel implementation. We perform extensive real data simulation to validate the optimization model and demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed algorithm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available