4.6 Article

Adaptively Adjusted Event-Triggering Mechanism on Fault Detection for Networked Control Systems

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
Volume 47, Issue 8, Pages 2299-2311

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2016.2631903

Keywords

Adaptively adjusted event-triggering; fault detection filter (FDF); networked control system (NCS)

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP140102180]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [61374063, 61403170, U1509217]
  3. 333 Project Research Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BRA2015358]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20161361]
  5. Six Talent Peaks Project of Jiangsu Province, China [DZXX-025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studies the problem of adaptively adjusted event-triggering mechanism-based fault detection for a class of discrete-time networked control system (NCS) with applications to aircraft dynamics. By taking into account the fault occurrence detection progress and the fault occurrence probability, and introducing an adaptively adjusted event-triggering parameter, a novel event-triggering mechanism is proposed to achieve the efficient utilization of the communication network bandwidth. Both the sensor-to-control station and the control station-to-actuator network-induced delays are taken into account. The event-triggered sensor and the event-triggered control station are utilized simultaneously to establish new network-based closed-loop models for the NCS subject to faults. Based on the established models, the event-triggered simultaneous design of fault detection filter (FDF) and controller is presented. A new algorithm for handling the adaptively adjusted event-triggering parameter is proposed. Performance analysis verifies the effectiveness of the adaptively adjusted event-triggering mechanism, and the simultaneous design of FDF and controller.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available