4.6 Article

A Diversity-Enhanced Resource Allocation Strategy for Decomposition-Based Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
Volume 48, Issue 8, Pages 2388-2401

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2017.2739185

Keywords

Decomposition; multiobjective optimization; resource allocation (RA); solution density

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61402291, 61672358]
  2. CONACyT [221551]
  3. Early Career Scheme Grant from Research Grant Council under CityU Project [9048072]
  4. Early Career Scheme Grant from Research Grant Council under RGC Project [21200816]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) based on decomposition transforms a multiobjective optimization problem into a set of aggregated subproblems and then optimizes them collaboratively. Since these subproblems usually have different degrees of difficulty, resource allocation (RA) strategies have been reported to enhance performance, attempting to dynamically assign proper amounts of computational resources for the solution of each of these subproblems. However, existing schemes for decomposition-based MOEAs fully rely on the relative improvement of the aggregated functions to do this. This paper proposes a diversity-enhanced RA strategy for this kind of MOEA, depending on both relative improvement on aggregated function value and solution density around each subproblem to assign computational resources. Thus, one subproblem surrounded with fewer solutions in its neighboring area and more relative improvement on the aggregated function value will be allocated a higher probability for evolution. Our experimental results show the advantages of our proposed strategy over two popular RA strategies available for decomposition-based MOEAs, on tackling a set of complicated benchmark problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available