4.3 Article

Efficacy of a Web- and Text Messaging-Based Intervention to Reduce Problem Drinking in Adolescents: Results of a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages 147-159

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000138

Keywords

alcohol; problem drinking; mobile phone; text messaging; adolescents

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To test the efficacy of a combined web-and text messaging-based intervention to reduce problem drinking in young people compared to assessment only. Method: Two-arm, parallel-group, cluster-randomized controlled trial with assessments at baseline and 6-month follow up. The automated intervention included online feedback, based on the social norms approach, and individually tailored text messages addressing social norms, outcome expectations, motivation, self-efficacy, and planning processes, provided over 3 months. The main outcome criterion was the prevalence of risky single-occasion drinking ( RSOD, defined as drinking at least 5 standard drinks on a single occasion in men and 4 in women) in the past 30 days. Irrespective of alcohol consumption, 1,355 students from 80 Swiss vocational and upper secondary school classes, all of whom owned a mobile phone, were invited to participate in the study. Of these, 1,041 ( 76.8%) students participated in the study. Results: Based on intention-to-treat analyses, RSOD prevalence decreased by 5.9% in the intervention group and increased by 2.6% in the control group, relative to that of baseline assessment ( odds ratio [ OR] = 0.62, 95% confidence interval [ CI] = 0.44 -0.87). No significant group differences were observed for the following secondary outcomes: RSOD frequency, quantity of alcohol consumed, estimated peak blood alcohol concentration, and overestimation of peer drinking norms. Conclusions: The intervention program reduced RSOD, which is a major indicator of problem drinking in young people, effectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available