4.6 Article

A Systematic Relationship Between Functional Connectivity and Intracortical Myelin in the Human Cerebral Cortex

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 981-997

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhx030

Keywords

cortical microstructure; functional connectivity; high-resolution MRI; myelin imaging

Categories

Funding

  1. Oxford University Consortium by 16 NIH Institutes and Centers [1U54MH091657]
  2. McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience at Washington University
  3. NIH [1R01EB020740-01A1, 1P41EB019936-01A1, 3R01MH092380-04S2, 1U01MH108168-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research in the macaque monkey suggests that cortical areas with similar microstructure are more likely to be connected. Here, we examine this link in the human cerebral cortex using 2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures: quantitative T-1 maps, which are sensitive to intracortical myelin content and provide an in vivo proxy for cortical microstructure, and resting-state functional connectivity. Using ultrahigh-resolution MRI at 7 T and dedicated image processing tools, we demonstrate a systematic relationship between T-1-based intracortical myelin content and functional connectivity. This effect is independent of the proximity of areas. We employ nonlinear dimensionality reduction to characterize connectivity components and identify specific aspects of functional connectivity that are linked to myelin content. Our results reveal a consistent spatial pattern throughout different analytic approaches. While functional connectivity and myelin content are closely linked in unimodal areas, the correspondence is lower in transmodal areas, especially in posteromedial cortex and the angular gyrus. Our findings are in agreement with comprehensive reports linking histologically assessed microstructure and connectivity in different mammalian species and extend them to the human cerebral cortex in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available