4.6 Article

Prognostic impact of circulating plasma cells in patients with multiple myeloma: implications for plasma cell leukemia definition

Journal

HAEMATOLOGICA
Volume 102, Issue 6, Pages 1099-1104

Publisher

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2016.158303

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Generalitat de Catalunya [AGAUR 2014SGR-1281, 2014SGR-552]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [RD12/0036/0071, RD12/0036/0046, PI16/00423]
  3. Cellex Research Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
  4. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of circulating plasma cells in patients with multiple myeloma is considered a marker for highly proliferative disease. In the study herein, the impact of circulating plasma cells assessed by cytology on survival of patients with multiple myeloma was analyzed. Wright-Giemsa stained peripheral blood smears of 482 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma or plasma cell leukemia were reviewed and patients were classified into 4 categories according to the percentage of circulating plasma cells: 0%, 1-4%, 5-20%, and plasma cell leukemia with the following frequencies: 382 (79.2%), 83 (17.2%), 12 (2.5%) and 5 (1.0%), respectively. Median overall survival according to the circulating plasma cells group was 47, 50, 6 and 14 months, respectively. At multivariate analysis, the presence of 5 to 20% circulating plasma cells was associated with a worse overall survival (relative risk 4.9, 95% CI 2.6-9.3) independently of age, creatinine, the Durie-Salmon system stage and the International Staging System (ISS) stage. Patients with >= 5% circulating plasma cells had lower platelet counts (median 86x10(9)/L vs. 214x10(9)/L, P<0.0001) and higher bone marrow plasma cells (median 53% vs. 36%, P=0.004). The presence of >= 5% circulating plasma cells in patients with multiple myeloma has a similar adverse prognostic impact as plasma cell leukemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available