4.6 Article

Biobehavioral Factors That Shape Nutrition in Low-Income Populations: A Narrative Review

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages S118-S126

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
  2. University of California Office of the President Multiple-Campus Research Initiative, Stress, Environment and Weight
  3. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  4. Race, Stress and Dysregulated Eating: Maternal to Child Transmission of Obesity from NIH [R01HD073568, 1K99HD84758, 1K23HD075852]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although evidence exists for an association between income level and diet quality, a causal relationship has not been established. A number of studies found that the price of nutritious food and the time cost to prepare foods are economically driven reasons for this relationship. However, in addition to economic constraints, low-income individuals and families face a number of additional challenges linked with food choice, eating behaviors, and diet-related chronic conditions that contribute to diet quality and health. Low-income individuals have a higher burden of employment-, food-, and housing-related insecurity that threaten the livelihood of their household. Poverty and exposure to these insecurities are hypothesized to activate biobehavioral and psychological mechanisms-endocrine, immune, and neurologic systems-that influence food choice and consumption. Examples of biobehavioral and psychological factors that influence diet are stress, poor sleep, and diminished cognitive capacity. High levels of stress, poor sleep, and cognitive overload compound the challenges of economic constraints, creating a mentality of scarcity that leads to poor diet quality. (C) 2016 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available