4.7 Article

Human exposure to trace metals and arsenic via consumption of fish from river Chenab, Pakistan and associated health risks

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 168, Issue -, Pages 1004-1012

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.110

Keywords

Trace metals; Arsenic; ICP-MS; Fish; River Chenab; Human health risk

Funding

  1. Higher Education Commission (HEC Project) [PM-IPFP/HRD/HEC/2012/3599]
  2. President's International Fellowship for Postdoctoral Researchers, China [2016PB009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provided the first hand data of trace elements into fish muscles (N = 65) collected from river Chenab in Pakistan during 2013, using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). We monitored the health risk associated with consumption of contaminated fish of river Chenab, by the local population. The mean concentrations (mu g/g, wet weight), in descending order were: Zn (35.5-54.4), Cu (1.38-4.57), Mn (2.43-4.5), As (0.23-1.21), Cr (0.21-0.67), Ni (0.14-034), Pb (0.14-031), Co (0.09-0.12), Cd (0.07-0.12) with higher concentration to be observed in the herbivore fish species (i.e., Cirrhinus reba and Catla catla). The levels of trace elements in different fish species found in this study were compared with similar data worldwide, and with the international standards for consumption. The concentration (mu g/g) of arsenic in many cases (>65%) exceeded the FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives permissible limits. From the human health point of view, this study highlights that the local inhabitants, (i.e., fisher folk communities and population frequently consuming fish at about 100 g/day) along the river Chenab are exposed chronically to arsenic pollution with carcinogenic (10(-4) to 10(-6)) and non-carcinogenic (THQ>1) risks, especially from the intake of Cirrhinus reba. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available