4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Colorectal surgery in elderly patients: our experience with DaVinci Xi® System

Journal

AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages S91-S99

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40520-016-0670-y

Keywords

Robotic surgery; Colectomy; Rectal resection; Colorectal cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Robotic technology for colorectal surgery was introduced by Weber in 2002 to improve the benefits of the minimally invasive surgery already offered by the laparoscopic approach. Aims To evaluate the feasibility and the efficacy of the application of robotic surgery in elderly patients affected by colorectal diseases. Methods We reported the outcomes obtained during our first 50 colorectal robotic surgical performances with DaVinci Xi (R) System, and we compared the results assessed for patients younger or older than 70 years. Results We examined 28 patients younger and 22 older than 70 years who underwent colorectal robotic surgery in our institution from September 2014 to June 2016. We performed 15 right colectomies, 20 left colectomies, 15 rectal resections. MeanASA score was significantly higher in the Elderly Group. No statistically significant differences have been revealed in terms of post-operative morbidity, hospital stay, first diet intake, first flatus canalization and oncological outcome. Discussion According to the prolonged operative time, robotic technology was initially reserved to young patients with good performance status in order to avoid systemic failures in elderly patients suffering from pre-existent comorbidities. Otherwise, once robotic approach safety and benefits in terms of better systemic outcomes were demonstrated, it started to be performed in elderly patients with satisfactory outcomes. Conclusion Our experience revealed that robotic surgical approach is safe, feasible and offers many systemic benefits in elderly patients also with high ASA score. Age alone has not to be considered as exclusion criteria for robotic approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available