Journal
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Volume 206, Issue -, Pages 314-319Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.11.025
Keywords
Averted loss; Brigalow; Biodiversity offsets; Mitigation; Land clearing; Regrowth
Funding
- Australian Research Council Future Fellowship [FT140100516]
- National Environmental Science Program's Threatened Species Recovery Hub
- USDA McIntire-Stennis award [2014-32100-06050]
- NIFA [687215, 2014-32100-06050] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Biodiversity offsets are used to mitigate the residual impacts of development on biodiversity. However, their ability to achieve no net loss is rarely evaluated, and factors leading to their success are mostly unknown. Here, we modelled the biodiversity outcomes of averted loss offsetting in terms of vegetation extent and habitat quality in the endangered brigalow woodlands of central Queensland, Australia. We found that biodiversity outcomes were highly sensitive to the time period used to inform counterfactual scenarios and to large differences in clearing pressures among vegetation types used for offsetting. Our results reveal major challenges for achieving no net loss of biodiversity in dynamic landscapes globally. Offsetting policies must develop plausible counterfactual scenarios a difficult task in a volatile regulatory context and allocate offsets according to spatially-explicit counterfactual biodiversity losses and gains. Failing to do so may drastically overestimate the expected outcomes of offsets and thus result in large net biodiversity losses. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available