4.7 Article

Mediterranean diet, micronutrients and macronutrients, and MRI measures of cortical thickness

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 168-177

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.2359

Keywords

Cortical thickness; Diet; Fish; Fruit; Legumes; Macronutrients; Nutrition; Sugar; Vitamins; Cross-sectional studies; Biomarkers; Magnetic resonance imaging; Structural brain changes

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [U01 AG006786, P50 AG016574, R01 AG011378, R01 AG041851]
  2. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  3. Rochester Epidemiology Project [R01 AG034676]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The Mediterranean diet (MeDi) is associated with reduced risk of cognitive impairment, but it is unclear whether it is associated with better brain imaging biomarkers. Methods: Among 672 cognitively normal participants (mean age, 79.8 years, 52.5% men), we investigated associations of MeDi score and MeDi components with magnetic resonance imaging measures of cortical thickness for the four lobes separately and averaged (average lobar). Results: Higher MeDi score was associated with larger frontal, parietal, occipital, and average lobar cortical thickness. Higher legume and fish intakes were associated with larger cortical thickness: legumes with larger superior parietal, inferior parietal, precuneus, parietal, occipital, lingual, and fish with larger precuneus, superior parietal, posterior cingulate, parietal, and inferior parietal. Higher carbohydrate and sugar intakes were associated with lower entorhinal cortical thickness. Discussion: In this sample of elderly persons, higher adherence to MeDi was associated with larger cortical thickness. These cross-sectional findings require validation in prospective studies. (C) 2016 the Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available