Journal
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages 39-53Publisher
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0003055416000605
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada [435-2012-1747.]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Over the last few decades, democratic theory has grown dramatically in its power and sophistication, fueled by debates among models of democracy. But these debates are increasingly unproductive. Model-based strategies encourage theorists to overgeneralize the place and functions of ideal typical features of democracy, such as deliberation or elections. Here I sketch an alternative strategy based on the question: What kinds of problems does a political system need to solve to count as democratic? I suggest three general kinds: it should empower inclusions, form collective agendas and wills, and have capacities to make collective decisions. We can view common practices such as voting and deliberating as means for addressing these problems, and theorize institutional mixes of practices that would maximize a political system's democratic problem-solving capacities. The resulting theories will be both normatively robust and sufficiently fine-grained to frame democratic problems, possibilities, and deficits in complex polities.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available