4.7 Article

3D printed components of microbial fuel cells: Towards monolithic microbial fuel cell fabrication using additive layer manufacturing

Journal

SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages 94-101

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2016.11.006

Keywords

Microbial fuel cell (MFC); 3D printing; Additive manufacturing (AM); Polymer membrane; PLA based polymer anode

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) UK [EP/N005740/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/N005740/1, EP/L002132/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N005740/1, EP/L002132/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For practical applications of the MFC technology, the design as well as the processes of manufacturing and assembly, should be optimised for the specific target use. Another burgeoning technology, additive manufacturing (3D printing), can contribute significantly to this approach by offering a high degree of design freedom. In this study, we investigated the use of commercially available 3D printable polymer materials as the MFC membrane and anode. The best performing membrane material, Gel-Lay, produced a maximum power of 240 +/- 11 mu W, which was 1.4-fold higher than the control CEM with PMAX of 177 +/- 29 mu W. Peak power values of Gel-Lay (133.8-184.6 mu W) during fed-batch cycles were also higher than the control (133.4-160.5 mu W). In terms of material cost, the tested membranes were slightly higher than the control CEM, primarily due to the small purchased quantity. Finally, the first 3D printable polymer anode, a conductive PLA material, showed significant potential as a low-cost and easy to fabricate MFC anode, producing a stable level of power output, despite poor conductivity and relatively small surface area per unit volume. These results demonstrate the practicality of monolithic MFC fabrication with individually optimised components at relatively low cost. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available